[29ASR2d187]
VOYAGER, INC., Appellant
v.
HIGH COURT OF
_______________________
BRIAN BLOCKER, Intervenor
High Court of
Appellate Division
AP No. 28-92
[1] Regardless of whether the appellate court
vacates its decision, an appellant is
not entitled to vacatur of the decision of the
trial division.
Before CANBY,*
Acting Associate Justice, MUNSON,**
Acting Associate Justice, WARD,***
Acting Associate Justice, VAIVAO, Associate Judge, and BETHAM, Associate Judge.
Counsel: For Appellant, William H. Reardon and
William Banning
For
Intervenor, Roy J.D. Hall, Jr.
Order Denying Appellant's Petition
for Rehearing:
This court, having reviewed appellant's petition for
rehearing and finding no points of law or fact which were overlooked or
misapprehended by this court when reaching its decision after oral argument,
hereby denies the petition for rehearing.
[1] Appellant has suggested that
our decision and that of the trial division must be vacated because the case
was finally settled days before we rendered our decision. It is now clear that, regardless of whether
we vacated our decision, appellant would not be entitled to vacatur
of the decision of the trial division. U.S.
Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, 513
In the unique circumstances of this case, we also
decline to vacate our Appellate Division decision. We were not notified of the settlement until
after we had filed our decision. As we
stated in our opinion, we were not exercising jurisdiction pursuant to Article
III of the
It is so ordered.
* The Honorable William C. Canby, Jr.,
Circuit Judge,
** The Honorable Alex R. Munson,
*** The Honorable John L. Ward II, Judge, District Court of American Samoa, sitting by designation of the United States Secretary of the Interior.