ÿWPCá  ¶X¦Sê<« îûØ æó+š“MOÚÚ†l†Èå ù%¡"ä‰ë3ÝOÅþ'㣤ü¾–\pš?¢ ^ ¬ w¸ 4¼ Ð ß (›$Ï$¡¡ÔUSUS.,ÔÓK€ (€X°KÓÔ€ X&ßXXXÔÔ€ X&ßXXX&ßÔ ƒÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ˜Kinko's File Prep Tool0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX ˜C:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\WEB\WP9WEB.WPTC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\Template\Custom WP Templates\Web\wp9web.wpt)!ÈÈÈÈdxdx(ÖÃ9 Z‹&Times New RomanC:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\POPLAR.GIF pC:\PROGRA~1\COREL\WORDPE~1\TEMPLATE\CUSTOM~1\POPLAR.GIFC:\Program Files\Corel\WordPerfect Office 2000\template\Custom WP Templates\poplar.gif§ Àξo54eüR§K#4eüR§,LѾJ¬?Àξ\R¬?Àξl‹ŸüÓ¾úO¬?Ò¤÷¤€Yˆ|ξ<A_ä¤Òl‹Ÿà¤Òà¤Òà¤ÒôQz,L ¿q,ertyBar3|xÝ ƒ$Ï!ÝÔUSUS.,ÔÓK€ (€XKÓÔ€ X ÙXXXÔÔ€ X ÙXX X ÙÔÝ  ÝÔ_ÔÓ  Óò òMERIDIAN€Ô_ÔBRECKWOLDTÔ_Ô€SAMOA,€Ltd.,€Plaintiff€ó óÐ ÜÜ Ðò òv.€ó óÐ ¤¤ Ðò òMAX€Ô_ÔHALECKÔ_Ô,€Inc.,€Defendant€ó óÐ ll Ðò òHigh€Court€of€American€Samoa€Ð 44 ÐTrial€Division€ó óÐ    Ðò òCA€No.€117-86€ó óÐ èè Ðò òMarch€16,€1988ó óÐ ° °  Ðò ò__________ó ó€Ð x x  ÐÓ  Óò òIn€an€international€transaction€between€two€corporations€represented€by€sophisticatedÐ DD Ðbusinessmen,€the€burden€of€determining€whether€the€product€complied€with€regulations€inÐ 00  Ðbuyer's€locality€was€on€the€buyer.€ó óÐ   Ðò òSeller€who€had€been€partly€reimbursed€by€carrier€for€price€of€goods€wrongfully€delivered€byÐ ää  Ðcarrier€to€buyer€could€recover€the€remainder€of€the€unpaid€purchase€price,€but€not€the€amountÐ ÐÐ  Ðalready€recovered€from€the€carrier,€in€a€subsequent€action€against€the€buyer.€ó óÐ ¼¼  Ðò òWhere€contract€provides€for€payment€in€a€foreign€currency€but€payment€is€made€in€United€StatesÐ „„ Ðdollars,€payment€should€ordinarily€be€in€an€amount€equal€to€the€specified€foreign€currencyÐ pp Ðamount€according€to€the€exchange€rate€on€the€date€specified€for€payment.€ó óÐ \\ Ðò òWhere€contract€provided€for€payment€in€a€foreign€currency€whose€value€in€relation€to€UnitedÐ $$ ÐStates€dollars€had€increased€since€the€time€specified€for€payment,€buyer€who€had€not€paid€on€timeÐ  Ðbore€the€burden€of€the€subsequent€shift€in€the€exchange€rate€and€would€be€held€liable€in€anÐ üü Ðamount€equal€to€the€specified€foreign€currency€amount€according€to€the€exchange€rate€on€the€dateÐ èè Ðof€judgment.€ó óÐ ÔÔ Ðò òBuyer€was€liable€for€bank€charges€imposed€on€seller€due€to€buyer's€failure€to€make€payment€to€theÐ œœ Ðbank€as€specified€in€the€contract,€at€least€where€such€charges€would€otherwise€have€been€imposedÐ ˆˆ Ðdirectly€on€buyer€and€in€the€course€of€prior€dealings€the€[7ASR2d96]ó ó€ò òbuyer€had€reimbursed€sellerÐ t t  Ðfor€bank€charges€imposed€on€seller.€ó óÐ d!d! Ðò òBuyer€was€not€liable€for€costs€incurred€by€seller€as€a€consequence€of€buyer's€having€madeÐ ,#,# Ðpayment€in€a€way€not€specified€by€the€contract,€where€seller€had€authorized€the€alternate€mode€ofÐ $$ Ðpayment.€ó óÐ %% Ðò òTerritorial€statute€providing€that€interest€charge€in€excess€of€6%€is€unenforceable€unless€theÐ Ì&Ì& Ðamount€"is€in€writing€and€is€signed€by€the€party€to€be€charged"€precluded€court€from€holdingÐ ¸'¸' Ðdebtor€liable€to€pay€interest€at€a€higher€rate€in€the€absence€of€a€signed€agreement,€even€whenÐ ¤(¤( Ðdebtor€knew€bank€would€charge€creditor€a€higher€rate€of€interest€on€amounts€not€timely€paid€byÐ ))  Ðdebtor.€Ô_ÔA.S.C.A.Ô_Ô€ðð€28.1501(a).€ó óÐ |*|*! ÐBefore€REES,€Chief€Justice,€Ô_ÔAFUOLAÔ_Ô,€Associate€Judge,€and€Ô_ÔTUIAFONOÔ_Ô,€Associate€Judge.€Ð D,D," ÐCounsel:€For€Plaintiff,€Charles€Ô_ÔAla'ilimaÔ_ԀР . .# Ѐ€€€€€€€€€€€€€€For€Defendant,€William€Ô_ÔReardonÔ_ԀРø.ø.$ ÐFINDINGS€OF€FACT:€Ð À0À0% Ѐ€€€€1)€In€1984€defendant€agreed€to€purchase€a€quantity€of€rice€from€plaintiff€for€$7840.40.€DefendantÐ ˆ2ˆ2& Ðreceived€the€goods€in€June€1984€and€has€made€two€payments€totaling€$1890.67€(check€#€10329€andÐ ÜÜ Ð$640.67€from€check€#10289)€toward€the€principal€amount.€Ð ÈÈ Ѐ€€€€2)€Later€in€1984€defendant€agreed€to€purchase€more€rice€from€plaintiff.€The€rice€was€received€in€orÐ  Ðaround€December€of€1984.€The€original€agreement€was€for€a€price€of€$15,780.60,€but€after€an€initialÐ || Ðpayment€of€$5913.67€both€parties€treated€the€remaining€debt€as€being€in€the€amount€of€$9893.38.Ð hh Ð($5913.67€and€$9893.38€add€up€to€$15807.05,€or€$26.45€more€than€the€agreed€purchase€price.€€TheÐ TT Ð$26.45€was€apparently€a€charge€by€the€bank€which€was€supposed€to€have€processed€the€transaction.)Ð @@ ÐDefendant€has€made€payments€on€this€debt€in€a€total€amount€of€$9893.38€(checks€#€8785,€8901,€8978Ð ,, Ðand€9407,€and€cashier's€check€#€1-6469495).€Ð    Ѐ€€€€3)€Defendant€agreed€to€purchase€a€quantity€of€sugar€from€plaintiff,€which€was€received€inÐ à à  Ðò ò[7ASR2d97]ó ó€September€of€1984.€The€purchase€price€of€$6692€was€paid.€(Check€#€8603.)€Ð Ì Ì  Ѐ€€€€4)€Defendant€agreed€to€purchase€some€plywood€and€some€axes€from€plaintiff.€These€were€received€inÐ ˜ ˜  Ð1984€and€the€purchase€price,€along€with€interest€at€the€rate€of€11%€billed€by€plaintiff€to€defendant,€wasÐ „„  Ðpaid€during€1985.€€Since€payment€was€not€made€through€the€banking€system€as€was€originallyÐ pp  Ðcontemplated€by€the€parties,€plaintiff€was€charged€at€least€$25€by€the€banks.€€(In€connection€with€thisÐ \\ Ðtransaction€and€others,€plaintiff€also€incurred€costs€for€the€purchase€of€bank€drafts€for€onwardÐ HH Ðtransmission€of€the€funds€received€from€defendant.€Although€plaintiff€has€grouped€these€chargesÐ 44 Ðtogether€in€its€exhibits€with€bank€charges€for€processing€of€papers,€the€former€bear€a€more€attenuatedÐ    Ðrelationship€to€the€contracts€between€plaintiff€and€defendant.)€Ð    Ѐ€€€€5)€Defendant€agreed€to€purchase€from€plaintiff€a€quantity€of€"safety€glass"€for€use€on€busÐ ÔÔ Ðwindshields.€€The€agreed€price€was€26,826€DM€(Ô_ÔDeutschemarksÔ_Ô).€€We€find€the€following€factsÐ ÀÀ Ðconcerning€this€contract:€Ð ¬¬ Ѐ€€€€a)€Plaintiff€mayor€may€not€have€understood€that€the€glass€was€Ð tt Ѐ€€€€to€be€used€only€for€windshields€and€not€for€other€car€windows.€Ð `` Ѐ€€€€(Plaintiff's€manager/salesman,€Frank€Werner,€used€the€term€Ð LL Ѐ€€€€"window€screening"€in€a€number€of€his€communications€with€Ð 88 Ѐ€€€€suppliers€and€others.)€Ð $$ Ѐ€€€€b)€The€president€of€defendant€company,€Max€Ô_ÔHaleckÔ_Ô€Jr.,€told€Ð ìì Ѐ€€€€Werner€that€his€father€had€used€to€import€glass€from€Germany€Ð ØØ Ѐ€€€€for€use€on€cars€in€American€Samoa€and€that€he€wished€to€Ð Ä Ä  Ѐ€€€€resume€the€practice.€Ð °!°! Ѐ€€€€c)€After€the€order€was€placed€Ô_ÔHaleckÔ_Ô€asked€Werner€whether€the€Ð x#x# Ѐ€€€€glass€could€be€cut.€€Werner€inquired€of€his€suppliers€and€Ð d$d$  Ѐ€€€€transmitted€to€Ô_ÔHaleckÔ_Ô€the€reply€that€cutting€the€glass€was€not€Ð P%P%! Ѐ€€€€recommended.€Ô_ÔHaleckÔ_Ô€did€not€cancel€the€order.€Ð <&<&" Ѐ€€€€d)€Shortly€January€of€1985€was€sure€it€was€that€effect.€conversation€Ð ((# Ѐ€€€€that€after€the€glass€arrived€in€Ô_ÔHaleckÔ_Ô€asked€Werner€whether€he€Ð ð(ð($ Ѐ€€€€safety€glass,€or€something€to€(This€was€in€a€telephone€mayor€Ð Ü)Ü)% Ѐ€€€€may€not€have€been€ò ò[7ASR2d98]€ó óespecially€for€the€purpose€of€Ð È*È*& Ѐ€€€€asking.€about€the€glass.€The€two€men€talked€frequently€by€phone€Ð ¸+¸+' Ѐ€€€€in€connection€with€a€variety€of€transactions.)€Werner€responded€Ð ¤,¤,( Ѐ€€€€that€it€was€indeed€safety€glass€and€that€it€is€the€standard€glass€Ð --) Ѐ€€€€used€on€cars€in€Germany.€Ô_ÔHaleckÔ_Ô€then€offered€the€glass€for€sale€Ð |.|.* Ѐ€€€€in€American€Samoa.€Ð h/h/+ Ѐ€€€€e)€The€glass€proved€unmarketable€in€American€Samoa,€primarily€Ð 0101, Ѐ€€€€because€it€shatters€more€easily€than€the€glass€that€is€usually€used€Ð 22- Ѐ€€€€for€windshields€in€the€United€States.€(Plaintiff€and€defendant€Ð ÜÜ Ѐ€€€€disagreed€about€whether€the€German€glass€is€more€or€less€Ð ÈÈ Ѐ€€€€dangerous€than€the€glass€usually€used€for€American€windshields.€Ð ´´ Ѐ€€€€Werner€testified€that€the€particular€way€in€which€the€glass€shatters€Ð    Ѐ€€€€is€itself€a€safety€feature€and€that€in€Germany€the€American€glass€Ð ŒŒ Ѐ€€€€is€regarded€as€unsafe€because€it€cracks€without€disintegrating€Ð xx Ѐ€€€€and€thereby€encourages€people€to€drive€with€broken€windshields.€Ð dd Ѐ€€€€The€Court€has€insufficient€evidence€on€which€to€base€a€Ð PP Ѐ€€€€conclusion€on€this€point.)€€Ô_ÔHaleckÔ_Ô€received€a€number€of€Ð << Ѐ€€€€complaints€from€people€who€had€purchased€the€glass€from€him.€Ð ( (  Ѐ€€€€f)€Ô_ÔHaleckÔ_Ô€later€asked€Werner€to€provide€certification€that€the€Ð ð ð  Ѐ€€€€glass€met€United€States€government€standards€for€use€in€car€Ð Ü Ü  Ѐ€€€€windshields.€In€March€1986€Werner€provided€letters€from€his€Ð È È  Ѐ€€€€suppliers€certifying€that€the€glass€was€"fully€tempered"€and€met€Ð ´ ´  Ѐ€€€€"the€new€interim€federal€specification€DD-G-001403."€One€of€Ð    Ѐ€€€€the€letters€was€certified€(presumably€the€certification€was€of€its€Ð ŒŒ Ѐ€€€€authenticity€rather€than€of€the€accuracy€of€its€contents)€by€the€Ð xx Ѐ€€€€Hamburg€Chamber€of€Commerce.€Ð dd Ѐ€€€€g)€In€October€1986€Ô_ÔHaleckÔ_Ô€wrote€a€letter€to€an€American€Samoa€Ð ,, Ѐ€€€€Government€official€in€charge€of€highway€safety,€requesting€an€Ð  Ѐ€€€€inspection€of€the€glass€and€imparting€his€suspicion€that€it€did€Ð  Ѐ€€€€not€meet€United€States€standards.€€Mr.€Ô_ÔHaleckÔ_Ô€testified€that€a€Ð ðð Ѐ€€€€representative€did€inspect€the€glass€and€informed€him€it€could€Ð ÜÜ Ѐ€€€€not€legally€be€used€for€windshields€in€American€Samoa.€Ð ÈÈ Ѐ€€€€h)€Simultaneously€with€the€series€of€transactions€described€Ð  Ѐ€€€€above,€plaintiff€and€its€parent€company€in€Germany€were€Ð || Ѐ€€€€attempting€ò ò[7ASR2d99]ó ó€to€recover€the€price€of€the€glass€from€Ð hh Ѐ€€€€the€shipping€line€that€had€released€the€glass€to€defendant€Ð XX Ѐ€€€€without€receiving€full€payment€as€required€by€the€shipping€Ð DD Ѐ€€€€contract.€The€shipping€company€eventually€paid€plaintiff's€Ð 00 Ѐ€€€€parent€company€18,000€DM€in€settlement€of€the€claim.€The€Ð  Ѐ€€€€shipping€company's€local€agent€then€retrieved€the€glass€from€Ð    Ѐ€€€€defendant.€Ð ô ô  Ѐ€€€€j)€Defendant€never€made€any€payments€on€the€price€of€the€glass.€Ð ¼"¼"! Ѐ€€€€6)€Defendant€agreed€to€purchase€from€plaintiff€a€quantity€of€tires€which€defendant€received€in€AprilÐ „$„$" Ð1985.€The€purchase€price€was€$15,576.70.€There€was€also€a€bank€charge€of€$32.63.€A€documentÐ p%p%# Ðreceived€by€defendant€prior€to€the€arrival€of€the€tires€indicated€that€interest€at€the€rate€of€9.625%€wouldÐ \&\&$ Ðbe€charged€"from€the€date€of€first€presentation,"€The€defendant€has€paid€at€least€$14,359.33€on€thisÐ H'H'% Ðpurchase€(cashiers€check€#€1-€6543731,€checks€#€9515,€9583,€9654,€9714,€9774,€9837,€9910,€9988,Ð 4(4(& Ð10058,€and€10153,€and€$609.33€from€check€#€10289)€and€seems€to€have€paid€the€remaining€$1250Ð  ) )' Ð(check€#€10197,€of€which€the€Court€has€been€presented€with€a€record€but€not€the€cancelled€check€itself).€Ð  * *( Ѐ€€€€7)€Defendant€also€seems€to€have€made€a€$2500€payment€toward€"interest€on€open€accountÐ Ô+Ô+) Ðpurchases."€(Check€#€10397;€the€court€has€a€record€but€no€cancelled€check.)€Ð À,À,* ÐÓ  ÓCONCLUSIONS€OF€LAW:€Ð ˆ.ˆ.+ ÐÓ  Ó€€€€€1)€Defendant€owes€plaintiff€$5949.73€toward€the€principal€amount€of€the€June€1984€rice€purchase.€Ð P0P0, Ѐ€€€€2)€The€glass€purchase€was€a€binding€contract€notwithstanding€the€various€misunderstandings€amongÐ 22- Ðthe€parties.€It€is€immaterial€that€Werner€may€not€have€understood€that€the€glass€was€to€be€used€only€onÐ ÜÜ Ðwindshields,€since€it€is€his€Ô_ÔunrebuttedÔ_Ô€testimony€that€this€type€of€glass€is€in€fact€used€for€windshields€inÐ ÈÈ ÐGermany.€We€reach€no€conclusion€about€whether€this€glass€does€in€fact€meet€U.S.€safety€standards;€in€anÐ ´´ Ðinternational€transaction€between€two€corporations€represented€by€sophisticated€businessmen€it€isÐ    Ðinappropriate€for€a€court€to€place€on€the€supplier€the€burden€of€ò ò[7ASR2d100]€ó ódetermining€whether€theÐ ŒŒ Ðproduct€complies€with€all€regulations€in€the€purchaser's€locality.€Defendant€knew€or€should€have€knownÐ || Ðthat€it€was€ordering€a€product€that€is€regarded€in€West€Germany€as€"safety€glass"€suitable€forÐ hh Ðwindshields,€and€this€is€what€it€got.€Even€if€defendant€had€immediately€returned€the€goods€on€the€groundÐ TT Ðthat€they€did€not€conform€to€the€contract,€we€would€hold€that€the€nonacceptance€was€a€breach€of€theÐ @@ Ðcontract.€That€defendant€actually€sold€some€of€the€glass€to€retail€customers€before€finally€notifyingÐ , ,  Ðplaintiff€that€it€would€not€pay€(even€though€defendant€may€have€done€this€partly€in€reliance€on€Werner'sÐ    Ðreassurance€that€the€glass€was€used€on€windshields€in€West€Germany)€and€did€not€seek€an€inspection€byÐ    Ðlocal€officials€until€almost€two€years€later€when€the€glass€had€proven€itself€thoroughly€unmarketable,Ð ð ð  Ðfurther€militates€against€defendant's€contention€that€the€contract€was€for€a€different€product€altogetherÐ Ü Ü  Ðthan€the€one€delivered.€Ð È È  Ѐ€€€€Plaintiff€cannot,€however,€recover€the€entire€purchase€price,€since€it€has€been€reimbursed€by€theÐ  Ðshipping€line€for€most€of€its€loss.€The€shipping€line€is€Ô_ÔsubrogatedÔ_Ô€to€the€rights€of€plaintiff€againstÐ || Ðdefendant€to€the€full€extent€(18,000€DM)€that€it€reimbursed€plaintiff,€and€may€have€a€cause€of€actionÐ hh Ðagainst€the€defendant.€Indeed,€the€shipping€line's€agent€has€repossessed€the€glass€in€an€apparent€effort€toÐ TT Ðmitigate€its€damages.€Ð @@ Ѐ€€€€The€parties€also€disagree€about€who€should€bear€the€burden€of€the€shift€in€the€exchange€rate€betweenÐ  ÐUnited€States€dollars€and€Ô_ÔDeutschemarksÔ_Ô€since€the€date€of€the€contract.€This€burden€should€fall€onÐ ôô Ðdefendant€for€at€least€two€reasons.€First,€in€an€international€transaction€calling€for€payment€inÐ àà ÐÔ_ÔDeutschemarksÔ_Ô€the€payment€should€presumably€be€in€that€currency€no€matter€when€it€is€made.Ð ÌÌ ÐMoreover,€if€defendant€had€complied€with€the€agreement€by€making€full€payment€at€or€around€the€timeÐ ¸¸ Ðof€delivery,€the€problem€would€never€have€materialized.€Accordingly,€defendant€owes€plaintiff€for€theÐ ¤¤ Ðcurrent€dollar€value€of€8,826€DM.€Ð  Ѐ€€€€3)€The€Court€will€assume€that€check€#€10197€for€$1250€on€the€second€rice€contract€and€check€#10397Ð XX Ðfor€$2500€toward€interest€were€actually€sent€to€the€plaintiff€and€were€honored€by€the€bank€unlessÐ DD Ðplaintiff€presents€contrary€evidence€prior€to€the€entry€of€judgment€herein.€ò ò[7ASR2d101]ó óÐ 00 Ѐ€€€€4)€It€was€a€term€of€all€the€agreements€that€payment€was€to€be€made€to€the€Bank€of€Hawaii€at€orÐ üü Ðaround€the€time€of€delivery.€In€each€case,€sometimes€with€the€acquiescence€of€the€plaintiff,€defendantÐ è è  Ðacquired€the€goods€without€paying€the€bank.€Since€defendant€was€aware€at€the€time€of€contracting€thatÐ Ô!Ô!  Ðthe€papers€would€be€processed€through€the€bank,€however,€and€since€the€evidence€establishes€a€course€ofÐ À"À"! Ðdealing€between€plaintiff€and€defendant€wherein€defendant€has€paid€bank€processing€charges,€the€CourtÐ ¬#¬#" Ðconcludes€that€defendant€owes€plaintiff€for€any€such€charges€incurred€by€plaintiff.€Ð ˜$˜$# Ѐ€€€€5)€In€contrast,€the€Court€has€insufficient€evidence€to€conclude€that€the€parties€agreed€that€defendantÐ `&`&$ Ðwould€be€responsible€for€the€cost€of€bank€drafts€purchased€by€plaintiff€for€the€transmission€of€funds€toÐ L'L'% Ðplaintiff's€banks,€suppliers,€and€principals€overseas.€€Although€these€charges€would€probably€not€haveÐ 8(8(& Ðbeen€incurred€if€the€defendant€had€honored€the€original€agreements€by€paying€the€Bank€of€Hawaii,€in€allÐ $)$)' Ðbut€one€instance€the€plaintiff€seems€to€have€acquiesced€in€the€alternate€mode€of€delivery€and€payment.Ð **( ÐThe€Court€therefore€concludes€that€the€defendant€does€not€owe€the€plaintiff€for€the€cost€of€bank€drafts.€Ð ü*ü*) Ѐ€€€€6)€The€evidence€establishes€that€defendant€knew€the€banks€would€charge€interest€if€payment€was€late.Ð Ä,Ä,* ÐIf€defendant€had€paid€for€the€goods€in€the€manner€originally€contemplated,€the€interest€would€have€beenÐ °-°-+ Ðcollected€from€defendant€by€the€Bank€of€Hawaii.€Since€defendant€did€not€pay€the€bank,€plaintiff€wasÐ œ.œ., Ðcharged€interest€by€the€corresponding€bank€in€Germany,€as€defendant€knew€or€should€have€known€wouldÐ ˆ/ˆ/- Ðhappen.€Several€of€the€contracts€specified€that€interest€would€not€be€charged€if€payment€was€madeÐ t0t0. Ðwithin€a€certain€number€of€days.€In€the€case€of€the€contract€involving€the€tires€it€is€clear€that€defendantÐ `1`1/ Ðknew€the€amount€would€be€9.25%;€there€is€also€evidence€that€defendant€paid€11%€interest€on€theÐ L2L20 Ðpurchase€price€of€the€plywood€and€axes.€Nevertheless,€under€the€statutory€law€of€American€Samoa€noÐ ÜÜ Ðdebtor€can€be€charged€interest€in€excess€of€6%€unless€the€amount€"is€in€writing€and€is€signed€by€the€partyÐ ÈÈ Ðto€be€charged."€Ô_ÔA.S.C.A.Ô_Ô€ðð€28.1501(a).€€Accordingly,€defendant€owes€plaintiff€interest€at€the€rate€of€6%Ð ´´ Ðon€the€amount€that€is€now€overdue,€and€6%€on€amounts€that€have€been€paid€for€the€time€during€whichÐ    Ðthey€were€overdue.€ò ò[7ASR2d102]ó ó€Ð ŒŒ ÐÓ  ÓORDER€Ð XX ÐÓ  Ó€€€€€Plaintiff€shall€have€judgment€against€the€defendant€in€an€amount€equal€to€the€sum€of€the€following:Ð    Ð$5949.73;€the€current€dollar€value€of€8826€DM;€any€costs€incurred€by€the€plaintiff€and€not€yet€paid€byÐ   Ðdefendant€for€bank€processing€charges€originally€contemplated€for€collection€from€defendant;€6%Ð ø ø  Ðinterest€on€all€amounts€that€are€or€were€overdue,€minus€$2500€already€paid€toward€interest;€court€costs;Ð ä ä  Ðand€post-judgment€interest€at€6%.€Counsel€for€plaintiff€shall€prepare€a€proposed€judgment€for€the€Court'sÐ Ð Ð  Ðsignature,€along€with€a€schedule€showing€how€the€amount€of€the€judgment€was€calculated.€Ð ¼ ¼  Ѐ€€€€It€is€so€ordered.€Ð „„  ÐÓ  Ó**********